To live my life without a plan, or to become steady and unchanging, that is the question, although not for Hamlet to consider, this is what Fandango is asking today. Would it be better to live a life of spontaneity, or one that is structured with stability? Life is much too short to take away all the fun, so spontaneity sounds good to me, but without any type of plan, I could face eviction and end up living in my car. I guess this is why Fandango refers to this as a provocative question, because there is a lot to think about here, and it is a tough one today. I have fallen on hard times before and I lived in my car and I went to Food Banks to receive free food, which I am not proud of, but when the economy is bad, sometimes you have no choice.
Let’s get to the real question which is actually 3 questions and they are, “Do you consider yourself today to be more of a spontaneous person or more of a stable person? Which characteristic in others, spontaneity or stability, do you prefer? Why?” When I was young, I never thought about my future and I had a live for today philosophy, but as I got older this changed. Since the only stability in my life comes from Social Security deposits to my checking account and these payments are supposed to last for as long as I live, I will get by. However, I read that Social Security benefits will be depleted by 2034, which is only 13 years away and if that happens, I will be in trouble. The benefits will not abruptly end, as they will still be able to pay 78 percent of the benefits that I was entitled to, and if that happens, I will need to tighten up my belt a bit.
I am very accepting of other people, especially since I don’t have to support anyone else besides myself, so I have no preference if others live their lives with spontaneity or stability. I can see advantages in both, as without spontaneity the world would be filled with robots, just going through the motions and this would be a serious loss of expression, which would affect music and art, but it would be better for the bottom line and then maybe my Social Security benefits would last longer.
Written for Fandango’s Provocative Question #139.
I think a balanced approach is better. Somewhere in the middle
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, either extreme would not be good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well stated!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Paula.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aristotle’s Golden Mean in all things.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Focus on a middle ground to obtain a balance between extremes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m in a similar situation as yourself Jim. In that I live on my own and I’m on benefits. Thankfully, I’ve always had a roof over my head though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am glad that you have stability.
LikeLike
I hope the dates on that depletion of our Social Security are false. I’ll do the ‘man’ (government) a favor by dropping dead if they legalize assisted suicide though. It seems that the two might go hand in hand, and leave the rest of the pool with a bit more, with a number of us opting out altogether. I don’t know what 2034 will bring, I’ll be 74 and I hope I’ll have been dead for at least two years then. But we’ll see what we’ll see. Interesting perspective Jim! That whole living in the car thing is terrifying to me. I never made it that far, but I got damned close. It changes your point of view greatly I think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am sorry if my post scarred you Melanie, but I urge you to stick around.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, it didn’t bother me. I’ve thought much the same thing for a while now and the two ideas just mesh together whenever I think about it. Have a great day Jim! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m a little of both…I’m not an organized person most of the time so I go in between.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is the best personality trait to have.
LikeLiked by 1 person